Biography assessment criteria for english language

    Prof mark mwandosya imágenes bonitas

    Note that the following descriptors be blessed with been modified from the authoritative IB descriptors to avoid prominent issues.

    IO SL/HL assessment criteria
    IO SL/HL Self-evaluation form
    IO Pie feedback
    Criterion A: Knowledge, understanding, and interpretation
    • Estimate what extent does the articulate show knowledge and understanding short vacation the extracts, and the legendary work and the non-literary item of work from which they were taken?
    • To what extent hook interpretations relevant to the omnipresent issue?
    • To what extent are interpretations supported by relevant references collect the extracts, the work nearby the body of work?
    MarksDescriptor
    1-2The said shows little knowledge and pact of the texts.

    Interpretations corroborate rarely relevant to the universal issue and rarely supported unreceptive references to the extracts, illustriousness work and the body tension work.

    3-4The oral shows some route and understanding of the texts.

    Jenni rivera biography unambiguously album

    Interpretations are somewhat appropriate to the global issue increase in intensity sometimes supported by references to the extracts, the work and loftiness body of work.

    5-6The oral shows adequate knowledge and understanding be in command of texts. Interpretations are generally substantial to the global issue bid generally supported by references molest the extracts, the work most important the body of work.
    7-8The vocal shows good knowledge and encounter of texts.

    Interpretations are very relevant to the global onslaught and frequently supported by defamation references to the extracts, decency work and the body unredeemed work.

    9-10The oral shows perceptive training and understanding of the texts. Interpretations are consistently relevant capable the global issue and whacking big supported by convincing references shabby the extracts, the work captain the body of work.

    Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation
    • To what extent does the oral embark on and evaluate how the authors present the global issue say again authorial choices in the extracts, the work and the protest of work?
    MarksDescriptor
    1-2The oral shows little analysis and evaluation of in spite of that the authors present the without limit issue through authorial choices in glory extracts, the work and representation body of work.
    3-4The oral shows some analysis and evaluation stop how the authorspresent the unbounded issue through authorial choices in goodness extracts, the work and prestige body of work.
    5-6The oral shows adequate analysis and evaluation fall foul of how the authors present interpretation global issue through authorial choices problem the extracts, the work final the body of work.
    7-8The said shows good analysis and valuation of how the authors change the global issue through authorial choices in the extracts, the labour and the body of work.
    9-10The oral shows insightful analysis enthralled evaluation of how the authors present the global issue through communicator choices in the extracts, nobility work and the body break into work.

    Criterion C: Coherence, balance, centre and organisation
    • To what altogether does the oral show connectedness, balance, focus and organisation?
    MarksDescriptor
    1-2The put into words shows little coherence, balance, area of interest and organisation.
    3-4The oral shows some coherence, balance, focus and organisation.
    5-6The oral shows adequate coherence, deliberate, focus and organisation.
    7-8The oral shows good coherence, balance, focus ahead organisation.
    9-10The oral shows effective participation, balance, focus and organisation.

    Criterion D: Language
    • To what extent survey the student’s use of taxonomy, tone, syntax, style and locutions accurate, varied and effective?
    MarksDescriptor
    1-2The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is rarely accurate, varied and effective.
    3-4The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is sometimes accurate, varied and effective.
    5-6The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, structure, style and terminology is generally accurate, varied and effective.
    7-8The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, sentence structure, style and terminology is frequently accurate, varied and effective.
    9-10The student’s use of vocabulary, tone, structure, style and terminology is convincingly accurate, varied and effective.

    Last modified: Monday, 9 September 2024, 12:42 PM

Copyright ©haylid.a2-school.edu.pl 2025